TOUCH

Kiefer Sutherland 24 - All Kiefer...All The Time

Kiefer Sutherland 24 - All Kiefer...All The Time
Visit KieferSutherland24.com for News and Info about Kiefer Sutherland

www.kiefersutherland24.com on Facebook

www.kiefersutherland24.com on Facebook
Join KieferSutherland24 Facebook Here

EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION

Receive E-mail Alerts: Send E-mail to 24JackBauer4Ever@gmail.com to Subscribe!
Showing posts with label Thanks Crave On Line. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thanks Crave On Line. Show all posts

Thursday, May 27, 2010

24 Feature Film Highly Anticipated

24 Feature Film Highly Anticipated
Fans sad about the series finale but anxious for the flick.
BY JENNIFER COX MAY 27, 2010


Last March, the cancellation of the once-popular TV drama 24 was announced due to low ratings. However, having developed a close cult following during its long-standing run on FOX, fans were elated with the subsequent announcement by producers that they were creating a feature film starring the show’s leading characters, including the much-loved Jack Bauer (played by Kiefer Sutherland).

“We all felt it was right to end it," executive producer Howard Gordon said in an interview with USA Today in March. "We've really had what feels like our last day. The real-time aspect was one of the propulsive devices, but it was very restrictive, even with the absurdities, the license we allowed ourselves."

The two-hour series finale aired last Monday and drew in nine million viewers(down from its average of 13 million).

"This has been the role of a lifetime, and I will never be able to fully express my appreciation to everyone who made it possible," Sutherland said in an article on Reuters. "Looking ahead to the future, Gordon and I are excited about the opportunity to create the feature film version of '24'."

Immediately following the finale of the crime drama, the internet was humming with hype over the impending flick. And, given all of the buzz TV-to-big screen titles have been receiving recently, most notably Sex and the City 2, critics think 24 could have a good chance of having its own big screen success.

Since 24 premiered in 2001, it has been awarded 68 Emmys including Best Drama in 2006 and Best Performance by an Actor in a Television Series – Drama in 2002 (Sutherland was nominated a total of seven times for his role).

Source: Craveonline

Friday, May 21, 2010

Mary Lynn Rajskub On The End of 24

Mary Lynn Rajskub On The End of '24'

Chloe O'Brian speaks out about the last hours of '24'

BY BLAIR MARNELL MAY 21, 2010


On Monday, "24" will come to a conclusion after eight seasons on Fox. While Mary Lynn Rajskub didn't join the cast until the third season, her character Chloe O'Brian has become an integral part of the series as Jack Bauer's primary computer expert and the closest thing he has to a friend.


Crave Online recently participated in a round-table discussion with Rajskub about her time on the series, her thoughts on the finale and whether Chloe will come back in the upcoming "24" feature film.


Q: What do you think is the appeal of Chloe to the audience?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: Just a really great charismatic, awesome person. What can I say? No, I’ve talked about this before that I really think it was something I talked about earlier which is her going from being that really annoying person that people kind of don’t like and blunt to then being someone very loyal that can be relied upon and sort of gets the job done. I think that was a surprising turn, and that’s what made her compelling and likeable.


Q: How much of your own personality dud you put into Chloe? And did you talk with the writers about trying to interweave Chloe’s quirky and slightly comedic personality with the more serious events in the show?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: The second part of that question first is that there’s surprisingly little discussion form the get-go besides the fact of the rocky beginning. Not rocky, but just not knowing if this character was going to stay [or] if it was going to work. But once Chloe was sort of in there as a character, there was very little discussion. There was just a lot of trust on both ends that I would see the stuff that they wrote for Chloe to say — which I think they had a lot of fun doing because of the nature of the show. When they would get these little lines of humor, I think that became very fun for both of us and sometimes I would look at what she would say and not believe that anyone would say that as me in real life. Then once I got the costume on and got on set, it was like finding a way to deliver the stuff while remaining as intensely involved in the events that were happening was really fun.


As for the first part of the question, I was doing comedy. Before that I was doing performance art. I did acting as a kid, but I went to school for painting, so my whole approach to performing is very organic. It’s kind of based on comfortable nervous character that I started out as in my standup routines where I would stand on stage and say, “What do you guys want? What do you want from me?” I would get laughs by simply saying my name because I was generally very nervous, truly, and then that became somewhat of a device, but that’s very much a part of me and a huge part of my personality. I definitely use that in the construction of the character and that’s just my style of acting is very natural. It was imaging what would I be like as a computer expert, trying to imagine what would I be as a computer expert in these crazy high-stakes situations.


Q: In the series finale, [Kiefer Sutherland] has a scene with you where Jack tells Chloe that he never dreamed how important she would be to him when she first showed up. Can you relate to that to what your own expectations were when you first showed up on the set?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: Absolutely, I like that perceptive parallel there, and I think that’s absolutely true. I’m going to use that in interviews from now on because it kind of mirrors real life in that way because when he says that speech to me that was exactly how I felt about this whole job. I had no idea when I started, and I think that’s kind of truthful to what the character has been and what this job has been for me, starting out with four episodes and then six episodes and thinking I was going to be fired.


[I was] just the geeky computer tech weird kind of by-the-book girl when I first started, but people were really annoyed because they people in their office that you remind me of this annoying person that works in my office with me to then be Jack’s most loyal helper for lack of a better word that’s not coming to my mind, the confidant and friend. It’s been pretty amazing and unexpected for sure.


Q: Your character has had this amazing, wonderful connection with Jack and of course your connection with Kiefer. How has that continued throughout the seasons and how has it evolved for you both with your character’s relationship with Jack and yours with Kiefer’s.


Mary Lynn Rajskub: Good question. I’m afraid I might have a disappointing answer, not really. I was going to say because my relationship with Kiefer has kind of remarkably been the same that it’s been since I met him which is on set when he’s playing Jack Bauer very intense, a little bit scary, keeps you on the edge of your toes, immediately just a very impressive guy in terms of his commitment to the story and making it good and keeping the pace. I was probably a little bit more scared of him when I first started than I ended up being, so that would be a change because he’s a sweetheart.


He helped me get over, there was a hump sort of. I talked about it a lot from being a computer geek in CTU to then helping Jack. He helped me with the emotional stuff and the high intensity that I had never done before, like when I had to look at his computer screen and kind of be watching my friend being hurt. I told him that I was really nervous to do that, and he stood off camera. He coached me through that to help me to kind of how he talked as if I was watching what was happening on the screen. You know what I’m saying and [he] helped me be a better actor and learn how to do that.


Q: Aside from Kiefer, who’d be in your top three favorite actors/characters that you’ve worked with on 24?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: I think I kind of pretty much deal with what’s happening right now, so I’m going to go with the people that I worked with this year, Mykelti Williamson and Katee Sackhoff and John Boyd was a great character, Arlo, this year. I’m always very close to the people that I’m in CTU with over the years, Reiko and Carlos Bernard and James Morrison. We always have a special bond because we do all of our scenes indoors with all of the computers and all the screens whereas there’s a whole other world of action stuff that we’re not really privy to.


Freddie Prinze Jr. I had a great time working with this year, Eric Balfour, Marisol Nichols. I think that’s enough people and more.


Q: You mentioned Carlos Bernard earlier, so just very quickly I wanted to ask because he had to fight to save his character’s life last season. Did you ever have a beef with the script in front of you in your point in the last several seasons? Did you ever have to fight to save your character’s life or have it changed?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: No, and I think that’s kind of funny you should say that. I think it’s worked in my favor that I haven’t fought for stuff. I’ve kind of hoped for stuff, but I’ve been pretty hands-off. I was not one of the people who walked up to the producers’ rooms and knocked on the doors and had big conversations.


I was very impressed that Carlos did that, maybe a little bit jealous, like he just talked them into making his character come back to life. I thought that was pretty ballsy and pretty awesome, but I’m very happy with what’s happened to my character. There have been certain years maybe where I wish I would’ve been able to do more, but at the same time, I was very happy that I kind of was always that anchor in CTU. I don’t feel bad about maybe leaving them wanting more as well as wanting more myself, but I think this year I’ve gotten to do a lot that I didn’t before which is great.


Q: Why do you think 24 made it this long for what on paper looks like a concept that would be lucky if it did last 24 hours?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: I think that’s exactly what the producers have talked about in the different press panels and things that I’ve read and talked about. They didn’t think it was going to go and I think that’s exactly the reason why it did go because it was original. It was different. It was well done. It was a passionate project and if you were around at every level from the producers and the writers to the camera crew to Kiefer, those are all key players that set the tone and the passion to make this concept that could’ve been a terrible idea.


It could have really fallen apart, but instead turned into this wonderful thing that, okay, two years, three years, five years in it’s like, okay, we’ve got to do this 24-hour concept again and make it fresh. I think that viewers can feel that, that it’s challenging them and it has the familiarity with all the plot lines that they burn through and all the characters that died. The thing that holds it is this concept that you know it’s on this time clock and how’re they going to make it work and how’re they going to make this fresh again. I think that’s kept it exciting all this time.


Q: You’ve gotten to do a lot of things that people playing computer nerds don’t usually get to do. You’ve gotten to wield a gun and you got to be choked in this last episode. Is any of that hard to do? Do you have to learn of figure out how to wield a gun or how to safely be choked?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: Well, luckily for me my character is not supposed to be able to do all those things, so I can get away with being a little bad at it which also I think it’s kind of fun. Not that I would be opposed to actually learning. For the choking and stuff like that, Kiefer is very good at all that stuff and very used to doing that, so I just kind of follow his lead and do what he tells me to do pretty much. That’s how that goes. I learned from him.


Q: What is your favorite moment as Chloe throughout your time on the series?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: I’ve been getting a lot of those kinds of questions lately and I have more fun kind of coming up with a moment that’s in my memory. I’ve twittered that and then I get back like 12 moments that the fans remember that I didn’t even remember. Certainly, having the gun and having to be on the run and on location was great. Edgar’s death is something that people remember and that was a very kind of a turning point I think for my character. Watching him die was hard. I’ve just liked it better and better, and it’s all kind of a big mush in my head, but this year it’s been a whole new set of things which is amazing that there’s so much left to explore in having those extra responsibilities and weighty questions of how to deal with. That was a whole new set of cool moments.


Q: "24" is known for killing off its characters regardless if it’s a main star or a co-star. I’m wondering if there was at any point over your stay on the show were you ever significantly concerned with Chloe being written off the show.


Mary Lynn Rajskub: I like that choice of words, significantly concerned. Using that word I would say no. I was not ever significantly concerned, but I would sometimes out of nowhere have a little panic, like, 'oh God, what if die?' I think for the first few years, like I said, it was more a worry of just being picked up again because they could’ve easily have just phased me out too. That’s the beauty of "24." It’s only one day. They could come back the next season and just not have me there.


That was a great blessing and compliment to me that they’d have me back in the place where I worked where they would have a whole new staff almost every year. That was exciting. I maybe stupidly, naively believed that I wouldn’t get killed because I was in CTU, but we all know bad things happen in CTU, so maybe I falsely believed that I wouldn’t, but then again not because I’m still here.


Q: What place do you think "24" has in TV history?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: I think it has a large [place] in TV history. There’s a really eloquent answer that someone’s given to the question which I’m not going to be able to give, but I think [it's] a groundbreaking show just in terms of the way it was filmed, in the storytelling and I think it kind of raised the bar for that genre of shows. I think there’s nothing like it. Countless people have come up to me and told me the "24" marathons that they’ve had. One girl said she gets together with her college roommates and they bond over watching "24" all these years together. I think that’s all I’m going to say about that.


Q: Are you going to miss these long hours and days that you’ve been spending on the show 24?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: Yes, absolutely. And I think leading up to knowing this was going to happen I was nervous in my head about the next job and the next paycheck and very practical things like that. Then when it actually came to an end it really was all about the crew and the show and missing that experience more than anything. That kind of sneaked up on me and was really very emotional. Yes, I will miss that.


Q: Have there been any discussions regarding Chloe possibly making an appearance in the 24 feature film?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: Well, I hope say for gosh sake. I’ve not heard much, but I am very much hoping that I will be involved. I think that could be very interesting to see how that happens.


Q: Do you think "24" will work in a film format? What do you that "24" will be able to do on the big screen that it can't do on television?


Mary Lynn Rajskub: Well, when I watch "24," it feels like a film because there’s so much going on. I think it really was groundbreaking in the filming of it and with the "24" [TV series] which would seem like sometimes when you have a narrow concept like that it forces them to cut to all these different stories that are happening simultaneously and makes it that much more exciting.


How are they going to make it into a film? I have no idea and I’ve not talked to anybody about that. I know that Kiefer’s really excited. I did an interview for Extra TV yesterday and he told me that Kiefer told him that there were three movies. They’re planning on three and so I always kind of get my news from what has already been said in the press.


In that regard I’m sure you guys know more than me, so please let me know if you hear that I’m in the movie. Please call me at home any time day or night. Yes, I’m kind of out of the loop, but I think it could be interesting and a creative challenge to see how they would handle that.


Source: Crave On Line

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

24 8.22 Day 8: 1:00pm-2:00pm Are You Ready for Iron Jack Bauer?












24 8.22 "Day 8: 1:00 p.m to 2:00 p.m"

Are you ready for Iron Jack Bauer?

BY BLAIR MARNELL
MAY 18, 2010

Episode Title: "Day 8: 1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m"

Writer: David Fury

Director: Milan Cheylov

Previously on "24":

Jack Bauer (Kiefer Sutherland) recovered evidence of Russia's involvement with the day's attacks and brutally slaughtered the man who killed his lover, Renee Walker (Annie Wersching). Former President Charles Logan (Gregory Itzin) demanded that current President, Allison Taylor (Cherry Jones) publicly reveal his role in keeping the fragile peace process alive, while he also coordinated the attempts to eliminate Jack.

Meanwhile, back at CTU, Chloe O'Brian (Mary Lynn Rajskub) attempted to uncover evidence to support Jack, while Agent Cole Ortiz (Freddie Prinze, Jr.) stewed in custody following Jack's execution of Dana Walsh (Katee Sackhoff).

Finally, Jack was able to tie the Russians back to Logan, thanks to the former President's voice-message service.

Story:

Logan finally gets his wish, as the President's press secretary gives a press conference praising his role in the peace negotiations with the I.R.K.. Eluding a CTU team, Jack and Ricker (Michael Madsen) split up, while journalist Meredith Reed (Jennifer Westfeldt) leaves with the evidence to expose the cover up. Realizing that the net is closing in, Logan convinces President Taylor to use her power to intimidate Reed's newspaper and take her into custody.

Back at CTU, Chloe gets Cole released in order to help her track down Jack through Ricker. Meanwhile, Jack plans and executes a one-man assault on Logan's vehicle, kidnapping the former President. Jack briefly interrogates him and gets most of the answers he was seeking,

Later, Jack stages another assault on the offices of Mikhail Novakovich ( Graham McTavish) — one of the leading conspirators behind the day's events. However, Jack is stabbed in the process and appears to be badly wounded.

Recovering from Jack's assault, Logan finally calls the arriving Russian President, Yuri Suvarov (Nick Jameson), revealing that Suvarov is the true mastermind of the day's events — a fact Jack is now also aware of, thanks to a bug planted on Logan.

Breakdown:

The thing I'm going to miss the most about "24" is the action. Whatever problems the series has had keeping plotlines and character motivations straight, the action has always been top notch. The assault on Logan's limo in the tunnel was a stand-out segment. Although, when Jack stepped out in full body armor my first thought was "My god, it's Iron Jack!"

When Iron Jack was breaking into the limo, there was a moment I was half-expecting the soundtrack to go "Ki Ki Ki, Ma Ma Ma." He definitely had his Jason going.

Prior to that, Logan finally called President Taylor out on her BS and essentially made the same arguments I mentioned last week. Here's the woman who is so righteous that she put her own daughter in jail for murder. But here she is down in the muck and still pretending that she's better than everyone. If the writer's intent was to make her unsympathetic, then good job. For someone supposedly tortured by what she is doing, it took very little convincing for her to subvert the constitution. Taylor lies so easily and it's still all on her.

I also love that everyone is so horrified that Jack gutted the guy who killed Renee — which was one of the goriest deaths we've seen on "24" — but by no means the worst thing Jack has ever done. Remember in season 2, when Jack cut off a child-molester's head so he could reestablish his cover in a half-hour? That was probably worse than this.

It's also kind of shocking how easy it is to steal a car in the "24" universe. Jack literally just finds a very poorly watched van with the keys in the ignition and basically drives off without the owner even noticing.

But back to Jack and Logan. Going face-to-face with the former President had to have been cathartic. That and punching him in the gut a few times. For all of Logan's talk of never exposing his Russian cohorts, when interrogated by Jack, he folds faster than anything in the world has ever folded before. Then Jack chocked him out and left him behind.

By the time Jack gets to the Russian's, he's just mowing people down without a thought. He does get stabbed and it's supposed to look serious... but come on! He's already been stabbed and shot today! And does anyone else remember when Jack killed a guy while having a heart attack in season 2?

I do have to applaud bringing in President Suvarov as the last major villain of the series, since at least it's someone we've seen before. Not that I fully buy the Russian's motivations this season.

Also, Logan falls for the same trick twice when Jack bugs him. In just 90 seconds on the phone, Logan and Suvarov lay out almost their entire villainous plan while Jack listens in. I honestly can't decide if the writers are being lazy again — on "24," there's rarely a plot twist that hasn't been used two to three times previously — or if it's Logan's fault for not thinking to check.

Still, it feels like a cheat.

Next Time on "24":

The clock winds down on Jack Bauer as President Taylor desperately tries to keep the peace agreement alive.

Crave Online Rating: 8.5 out of 10

Monday, May 10, 2010

24: Executive Producer Howard Gordon Interview

24: Executive producer Howard Gordon

We get a preview of the series finale and news of the 24 movie.
BY FRED TOPEL
MAY 10, 2010

It might not be as traumatic to watch 24 end as it will be for Lost. At least we know there could be a 24 movie coming. Still, by the end of 192 hours (194 counting 24: Redemption), we’ll no longer be speculating on how Jack Bauer gets across town so fast, or how Kim will escape the mountain lion. Executive producer Howard Gordon gave a conference call with the media to preview the series finale (appropriately airing May 24) and possible movie version of 24. Warning, his final answer is a bit of a spoiler, but really not one you didn’t already expect.

Q: People are still so upset about Renee’s death. Was there any other twist you’d pondered?

Howard Gordon: You know, actually typically we come upon these things as more improvisations but this was one that we had come up with at the very beginning of the season and stuck with and for reasons everybody has seen right now, which is obviously motivating Jack to this final climactic confrontation and taking him to a place he’s never been before. Unfortunately, I have to say I think people’s outrage I’m taking anyway as a measure of interest. Their indifference would have been far more hurtful than outrage. We have a history of doing that I remember when we did that with Edgar we got a fair amount of angry e-mail. This is something we thought about and thought about very carefully and hopefully did it well, I hope.

Q: When you found out that this would indeed be the final season, were you able to add any finality to the last hour?

Howard Gordon: You know, it’s a good question and it was one that the network asked as well. To me the show was going to end the way it was going to end, whether there was a ninth season or whether there was a movie. I think what changed is the context of it all. It really took on a different meaning. I think any number of seasons in years past, season four, season five, even last year I think could have been a really cool series finale. Only the fact that this was our series finale did I think have the context of wow, we’re really saying goodbye to this character. There is a final, final moment that is very specific to the series finale. Not so much a plot moment, it’s a punctuation that I think is unique to the series finale. The answer is no, we told the story the way it was going to be told.

Q: So where have you finally decided to leave Jack?

Howard Gordon: It’s a great question. Where we wanted to leave Jack was something we tried on a couple of very different endings on for size. The one we came to is the one that felt just right. It was not for lack of trying a couple different ways but we knew it when we saw it that this was the right way. One way we tried and didn’t work was a happily ever after for Jack. What he’s done, particularly in these last, forget about the past 8 seasons, what he’ll have done which you haven’t even seen yet again leaves him in a very compromised place morally, ethically and emotionally.

Q: We’ve seen Jack go dark before though.

Howard Gordon: It’s true although I’m trying to think if he’s ever been quite like this. Yeah, it’s a color we’ve seen before but this time we’re really pressing our bet. You see the next couple episodes, we’re all in.

Q: Can he ever come back from this, especially if you’re looking at doing a movie?

Howard Gordon: That was really the question we asked ourselves and the studio asked us. The answer is no. Jack’s never been able to snap back. Even when he’s happy, in season four when we introduced Audrey, it wasn’t like that discounted all the tragedy. This year, Jack allowed himself a moment of joy or human contact with his daughter, her husband and his granddaughter. It doesn’t discount the tragedy??? I don't think Jack is every going to recover from what’s gone on. It just adds to the weight and complexity and the darkness of his character. The character’s never gone happily ever after. That’s not in his wheelhouse. The show is ultimately a tragedy and you have to honor that.

Q: There was some talk of moving the show to NBC. Where really anything to that rumor?

Howard Gordon: You know, it wasn’t something I wanted to do. It was something I was willing to entertain as a loyal Fox employee and help Fox find new personnel to run the show, maybe even recruit some of the guys who have been with me. It was something I think we all felt, when we really looked at each other and Kiefer included, was we were really telling our final season. We kind of knew in the beginning of the year and kind of kept the door open. Fox may have had different conversations, didn’t share entirely the concerns we had that we really reached the creative end to the story and wanted to end as close to the top as we could. We did have conversations but when we really sat down and considered it, it was just something that never caught fire.

Q: You know, a lot of the fans hated the Dana Walsh character. How do you react to that?

Howard Gordon: Yeah, man, every season there’s something that people seem to fixate on. I got it. I guess all I kept telling people was to please wait until the story had been told before you commented. To me, I think episode 20 answered that question. I was really proud of that episode. What I liked too was for this admittedly complex and labyrinthine and confused, crazy character, this onion of a character got peeled down to the nub. You finally understand a little bit who she really is. Of course she’s a sociopath and it’s kind of an insane story, but to see in that moment that she really cared about Cole, that she really had done this to get her out of a situation she’d gotten into. Look, it’s crazy. There’s a girl from Rock Springs manages to get into CTU as an analyst under an alias. It’s crazy and the fact that it was the Russians had sponsored her and put her in there made it make some sense. It was a pretty wild roller coaster of a character that Katee pulled off beautifully. What I liked about it is what felt unnatural or weird was that very part, that she wasn’t authentic, that she was this counterfeit personality in the midst of our heroes. I’m happy with the way it resolved. I really haven’t gone online and really seen how people reacted, if they’re even more pissed off but in the end, she acquitted herself pretty well.

Q: Will anyone find the parole officer, Steven Root’s body?

Howard Gordon: They will, in the 25th hour. We actually had written a couple of discoveries and it just messed up our storytelling. I put it in the Behrooz file, things we speculate happened after the 24 hours. The body doesn’t start smelling until after the 25th hour. According to my forensics manual the stench doesn’t begin until hour six.

Q: What was it about Katee Sackhoff or her body of work that made you want to cast her?

Howard Gordon: All the writers were just fans of her from Battlestar. We just met her and liked her as a person. We knew this was a character with a past and this was a really interesting actor. In all honesty, we weren’t sure where the character was going to go. We just proceeded in good faith that we’d find something. It was a challenging part and Katee was game for everything we threw at her. Particularly in episode 20 I think that was her greatest moment. I think that was some phenomenal and nuanced performance that she gave.

Q: Even without the real time concept, will the movie a continuation of the series?

Howard Gordon: I’ve talked about this with Kiefer and with Billy Ray. We’re trying to get in sync with what we believe is requirement. There are two sets of requirements: Honoring the series and creative integrity of the character, and also potentially bringing in new people who can go back and watch and believe it’s been consistent. I think we recognize that we’re serving two masters or two audiences, not that they’re mutually exclusive but that there are two different requirements. That’s an ongoing question. What I really think is important that we do is not retread on [what we’ve already done,] make sure that like every season, that we’re moving forward with this character, that he’s in a place where we begin that’s a different place than he’s been before. We all realize we need to define that space. That’s what we’re figuring out.

Q: Without the hook of the real time, what can you do in a movie that you couldn’t on the series?

Howard Gordon: Well, in terms of the real time part of it, really the epiphany even to do the movie is really Jack is just a great character and take the real time conceit out of the equation for now, which I think is a huge part of the show I understand but I think Jack as a character has sufficiently broad shoulders to carry a movie in this genre. The contract we bought with our audience was “not good, never boring.” We really required a lot of latitude from our fans. I think our side of the contract was the keep it interesting and exciting. Even when some of these moments felt preposterous or strange, it always was interesting. Even if you wanted to yell at the TV, as long as they were yelling, we were happy.

Q: Are you happy that the ticking clock will be the show’s legacy?

Howard Gordon: Well, I think you’re right. One of the legacies of the show and perhaps the most important one is the revolutionary concept, but I think the legacy of the show, again having been here from the beginning, is the fact that we never let go of the reigns and never truly let down our guard. I’m proud of the effort everybody put into the show. The audience stayed with us by and large and I think that’s a measure of we kept the story interesting to us. Consequently it was interesting to write it. It’s not an impact but we certainly have had an interesting dance with the culture and society and the world after 9/11 so I think we were very much a part of the first decade of this century. We played a roll in it somehow. I think that legacy is a good one but hopefully we put on a good TV show that people will continue to watch on DVD and in reruns.

Q: Does ending the show indicate we’re in a different place than we were in 2001?

Howard Gordon: You know, the answer to me is really no. The show is eight years old, or actually nine years old and eight seasons and a movie. Everything has a beginning middle and end. That might’ve been the case back in season six. When it seemed that all these negative associations with the White House and torture policies and a bunch of other policies, were unfair negative associations that this show was of a certain time. I think season seven successfully rebooted the show and answered some of those criticisms, and leveled the playing field again so we could tell a good story. It’s not a measure at all frankly. I think the appetite would have kept us going if there had been a story to tell. I think Jack Bauer has a story, a beginning, middle and end and we’ve come to it.

Q: What kind of resolution can we expect between Jack and Chloe now that they’re opposing each other?

Howard Gordon: Well, we took three character, Jack, Taylor and Chloe and we really switched things around. We had this moment in episode 18 and 19, these moments that were very difficult to write and they really fought back, but there is a resolution. They’re all well earned. We tried to create situations that credibly justified these change-ups in their characters so we could understand what obviously was a complex situations with moving parts. It was difficult. Mary Lynn felt this too but to me it’s honoring this character, who isn’t the same character she was all those years back when she was this very idiosyncratic analyst at CTU. She’s a woman, she’s an adult, she’s a mother, she’s a wife and she’s now a boss. And a boss who’s posed to this old and good friend to whom she’s loyal and who she cares about but she also has a job to do. This guy has lost someone and perhaps lost some part of himself in the process which is potentially dangerous, not only to Chloe’s job but to the right thing. So I think it’s pretty well justified and we do have enough time to resolve it and I think it’s resolved pretty well.

Q: What has been the most creative fulfilling part of 24?

Howard Gordon: Getting to work with such talented people is a privilege that you’d have to have been doing it for long enough and be of a certain age to really appreciate it. Starting with my colleagues, my fellow writers who are just brilliant, I got to work with some of the best writers and producers in the business. The entire crew, but because of the culture we created, everyone was a stakeholder in the show. Whether hair or makeup or props and our editors, our editors are some of the best storytellers I’ve ever met. Not that it was a democracy but it was a creative effort and a team. Getting to work with people who I’ll never get a chance to work with this many talented people again was an amazing privilege. It was just a great nine years.

Q: Have you kept anything from the set?

Howard Gordon: I have. It’s so funny, the prop guy actually gave me something. What he gave me, I think I’m spoiling it but it’s a prop that hasn’t been on yet. It’s a pen, a special pen. That’ll come up and I have that on my desk now, a pen used for the signing of the peace treaty.

Source: Craveonline